11 Jul 09:20
Re: [OpenID] Canonical OpenID url form
From: Martin Atkins <mart <at> degeneration.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Canonical OpenID url form
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.openid.general
Date: 2008-07-11 07:20:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Canonical OpenID url form
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.openid.general
Date: 2008-07-11 07:20:32 GMT
Drummond Reed wrote: > Martin's right, Peter -- XRI is one option for Unicode. But you can also use > an internationalized domain name > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name) in a regular > URL. It uses Punycode (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode). > I hadn't thought of punycode. Certainly I think many of the existing implementations would struggle with unicode characters in the domain part of the URL. The spec doesn't really seem to say anything about this. Should libraries be applying the mapping set out in RFC3987[1] section 3.1 to incoming URLs? What about legacy servers that rely on their URLs not being encoded in UTF-8? The spec should probably say something about this, so that different implementations treat non-ASCII characters in an interoperable fashion. If it does already and I've missed it, then please point me to it! Cheers, Martin [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987
RSS Feed