4 Feb 2009 23:38
Re: [foaf-dev] foaf:accountAccesspage
Dave Brondsema wrote: > -1 to use a URL document like a twitter page, in rdf:about. See > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-cooluris-20071217/#distinguishing and > http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/#howname I agree, I think we're past the document vs. thing discussion now and have agreed that they should be separated. Can all of an account's essential characteristics be conveyed in a message? I don't think so. -> No information resource. Besides, a profile is just *one* possible page about an account. There might be other pages describing other parts of it, like a preferences page. > Why don't you just use the existing foaf:page property like this? (This > example is in turtle format) The issue is actually documented in the FOAF wiki ([1] where foaf:accountHomepage is proposed) and has been discussed in various places: [2], [3]. I thought there had been a more recent discussion on here which I replied to but I can't seem to find that. Anyway, foaf:accountProfilePage seems to be what many people use (including Henry Story: [4]). I still disagree with that because in my eyes foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf [5] captures exactly what is needed here. So if you really have to use yet another property just because it's used in a context where foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf hasn't been used before (but is perfectly valid for), then go ahead, but at least make it a sub-property of foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf. In my eyes it's an unnecessary duplication of properties. More re-use! Makes data integration easier!foaf:homepage [6] seems to be too specific because a profile page is not really a homepage. And foaf:page is too generic and doesn't have the nice feature of being an IFP. Regards, Simon [1] http://wiki.foaf-project.org/OnlineAccountHomepageIssue [2] http://markmail.org/message/ncvmqu2nb3jx55le [3] http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2007-June/008599.html [4] http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/personalising_my_blog [5] http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_isPrimaryTopicOf [6] http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_homepage
foaf:homepage [6] seems to be too specific because a profile page is not really a homepage. And foaf:page is
too generic and doesn't have the nice feature of being an IFP.
Regards,
Simon
[1]
RSS Feed