4 Jan 2012 17:50
Re: urxvt maximized
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@...> wrote: > On 4 January 2012 15:38, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@...> wrote: >>> On 4 January 2012 12:54, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...> wrote: >>>> I've noticed a problem with rxvt-unicode: when a window is maximized, an >>>> obnoxious unusable strip appears at the bottom of the window (about 1/2 >>>> cm of heigth). The strip disappears when the window is unmaximized. I >>>> have no idea whether this happens in other WMs. I currently have no >>>> other WM installed. xterm does not exhibit this behavior. Anyone with >>>> this problem? >>>> > > Could you explain what the actual problem is? xterm behaves the same > as urxvt for me, ie, any line or column that cannot fully fit a cell > is left empty and unused. > http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~jalmeida/urxvt_max.png http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~jalmeida/xterm_max.png http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~jalmeida/nomax.png The first picture shows the obnoxious dark blue strip at the bottom, the second doesn't. Both have a regular blue strip that is vim-specific, and has nothing to do with this. In bash, writing at the bottom of the maximized urxvt window means writing just above the dark blue strip, which is annoying. The third shows non-maximized windows, with the expected behavior. Of course, this problem may not be related to openbox at all... Thanks Jorge Almeida _______________________________________________ openbox mailing list openbox@... http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox
RSS Feed