Re: LiteStep Progress website

It's only hard to find because not many websites have linked to it yet. 
Which is partly the reason I posted here. :)

Also, there have been people working on litestep.info. Fractal.design 
has a nearly complete site ready and we already have both permission to 
use the domain as well as hosting for the site.

also, litestep.com is being worked on and is planned to be finished in 
2035 :)

About litestep.net and litestep.org, they are both owned by someone 
keeping them in the community. Please feel free to update litestep.net 
or create litestep.org. Getting permission for litestep.org isn't a problem.

-Acidfire

Erik Harris wrote:
> At 10:24 AM 8/17/2007, Alexander Vermaat wrote:
>> "Lately there has been a rumor saying Litestep is dead / dying. People 
>> claim no progress is being made and that soon no one will use it 
>> anymore. Not only do these rumors annoy the heck out of Litestep 
>> developers and users, it also discourages new people from starting to 
>> use Litestep.
>>
>> The LiteStep Progress website (http://lsp.litestep.info/) exists to 
>> prove them wrong.
> 
> No offense, but it's going to take a lot more than this to "prove them 
> wrong."  We need some organized, easy-to-find current information on 
> Litestep if anyone beyond a very small niche group is going to know that 
> it isn't long dead.  Easy to find?  The main three TLDs are a good place 
> to start.  Litestep.com produces an error.  Litestep.net shows a basic 
> page with virtually no info that demands that you sign up for an account 
> and log in before you can see anything (the eight tabs on the top lead 
> right back to the login page).  Litestep.org forwards to lsdev.org's 
> news page - the last update is pretty recent, May 2007, but it's simply 
> an announcement that the website will be undergoing major changes.  
> Prior to that, the most recent update is from 2005.
> 
> Google is another primary source.  The first four hits are for the three 
> pages above and the Wikipedia article, which isn't very well done and 
> doesn't have much on it to indicate that LS is alive and well.  
> Ls-universe has quite a few new postings, but they're all about module 
> updates.  All of the links listed for LiteStep itself are similarly 
> outdated or dead.
> 
> And if someone decided to try the .info domain, www.litestep.info 
> doesn't have anything of substance on it.  It's an ad for people who 
> want to use the litestep.info domain.  Good idea - how about a list of 
> sites already doing so, including "lsp"?
> 
> With all due respect, this little hard-to-find website isn't going to 
> tell anyone (aside from the people lingering on this list) that LiteStep 
> isn't essentially dead and buried.  I don't think this link is even 
> enough to convince everyone who is lingering on this list that LiteStep 
> is not dead or dying (to anyone who isn't intimately familiar with 
> Litestep, only one of the progress report items on the front page 
> indicates any progress with Litestep itself).  Whoever owns the three 
> primary "Litestep" TLDs need to step up to the plate (or transfer domain 
> ownership to you or someone else who has an interest in convincing 
> people that LS is still alive), and the various other sites need to 
> start pointing to valid LiteStep resources.
> 
> Erik Harris                                http://www.eHarrisHome.com
> -        AIM: KngFuJoe - Yahoo IM: kungfujoe7 - ICQ: 2610172        -
> Chinese-Indonesian Martial Arts Club      http://www.kungfu-silat.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org