27 Apr 16:42
Re: Ah, wonderful copyright
From: Houghton,Andrew <houghtoa <at> OCLC.ORG>
Subject: Re: Ah, wonderful copyright
Newsgroups: gmane.culture.libraries.ngc4lib
Date: 2007-04-27 14:42:00 GMT
Subject: Re: Ah, wonderful copyright
Newsgroups: gmane.culture.libraries.ngc4lib
Date: 2007-04-27 14:42:00 GMT
> From: Next generation catalogs for libraries > [mailto:NGC4LIB <at> LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim Spalding > Sent: 27 April, 2007 10:13 > To: NGC4LIB <at> LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Ah, wonderful copyright > > In sum, if OCLC has rights, they have to be contractual, not > from copyright law. I don't believe that OCLC ever claimed copyright on *any* individual MARC record entered or batch loaded by member libraries. OCLC, I believe, claims copyright on the aggregation of MARC records that comprise WorldCat. This, in my limited understanding of copyright law, is similar to when a publisher takes multiple copyrighted works and creates an aggregated work (anthology?). The publisher makes no claim against the individual works, only their authors can do that, but the publisher does have claim on the aggregated work. Andy.
RSS Feed