5 Feb 14:25
"Document"
Laval Hunsucker <amoinsde <at> YAHOO.COM>
2010-02-05 13:25:12 GMT
2010-02-05 13:25:12 GMT
Hi, folks. If you'll permit me to return for a moment to the discussion-topic which ran for a while on this list a couple of weeks back and which some of you presumably found to be of some interest -- on the question of what a "document" is, or what should be considered as such : In going through some of my old digital records for purposes of housekeeping today, I came across an old reference to something I'd since forgotten about but which is very relevant to the matter. It was a project ( "un travail collectif de réflexion" ) carried out at the CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique). The point was as follows : "Il se propose de préciser la notion de document dans son passage au numérique à partir de recherches qui privilégient plutôt la forme (comme un objet matériel ou immatériel), le signe (comme un porteur de sens) ou la relation (comme un vecteur de communication).". You'll find a very interesting paper on this by Roger Pédauque, dating from 2003, at http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/21/68/HTML/index.html under the title "Document : forme, signe et relation, les re-formulations du numérique", with a somewhat later version in the Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication at http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/21/99/PDF/sic_00000511.pdf. See also the piece by Jean-Michel Salaün at http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/23/26/HTML/index.html Just thought I'd mention this, for anyone who may be inclined to pursue the matter. - Laval Hunsucker Breukelen, Nederland
RSS Feed