2 Jan 15:24
Re: [Serna] Migrating Custom DITA Templates from 3.4 to 3.5.1
From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@...>
Subject: Re: [Serna] Migrating Custom DITA Templates from 3.4 to 3.5.1
Newsgroups: gmane.editors.serna.user
Date: 2008-01-02 14:24:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [Serna] Migrating Custom DITA Templates from 3.4 to 3.5.1
Newsgroups: gmane.editors.serna.user
Date: 2008-01-02 14:24:03 GMT
Paul Antonov wrote: > > Eliot, > > it seems that Serna does not use proper template, maybe because you are > trying to use obsolete directory layout. Serna searches for '.sdt' > (document template) files in two places: in all sub-directories of > $DATA_DIR/plugins (Serna3_5.app/Contens/plugins on Mac), and in all > sub-directories of location specified by 'Additional plugins' path in > Preferences. It is desirable to use paths relative to $TEMPLATE_DIR in > your .sdt files, because it makes them location-independent. I'm not sure I fully understand the implications here. Are you saying that all the dependencies for the template (that is, all the components of my DTDs) should be stored relative to the templates/ directory? If so, that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid, having to have multiple copies of my local declarations--in the case of DITA stuff, if you've got a local install of the Toolkit then you've already had to configure it to resolve your local shells and any local specializations you might be using--there should be no need to make copies of those for editors that can use XML catalogs to resolve the references from shell DTDs to their dependencies. Except for Arbortext Editor (which doesn't support XML catalogs), I should, in theory, be able to use a single set of declarations and catalogs with all XML editors. That ensures that all DITA-aware tools are always using the same exact declarations. Thanks, Eliot -- -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 610.631.6770 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
RSS Feed