7 Sep 15:30
Re: Classification for Arabic collections
From: J. McRee Elrod <mac@...>
Subject: Re: Classification for Arabic collections
Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.autocat
Date: 2008-09-07 13:30:10 GMT
Subject: Re: Classification for Arabic collections
Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.autocat
Date: 2008-09-07 13:30:10 GMT
Bill, Another complicating factor for you is that Arabic is written from right to left. Since spine labels will be in reverse order on roman alphabet and Arabic alphabet materials, these materials will probably be segregated on the shelf. In Korea, which is now written from left to right, I integrated the collection, with hunkul (Korean alphabet) Cutters filing before roman alphabet ones. All western materials were catalogued in the roman alphabet (including Cyrrilic), and eastern materials in hankul. Back to adapting DDC or UDC, you could also class geography with history, releasing 910 for Arabic history, again using the subdivisions from DS 4. An adaptation of DDC had been published din Japan (NDC), and one in Korea (KDC), and you may well find such an adaptation has been published in an Arabic country. But an advantage of using DDC or UDC with the 8A0/9A0 or 810/910 is the DDC and UDC are kept up to date, unlike most published adaptations, and apart for Arabic literature and history, you can use class numbers in derived records. Mac __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (mac@...) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________ ***********************************************************************(Continue reading)
RSS Feed