1 Apr 21:10
Re: Serials question: major/minor title change
Steve: Thank you for your reply. I had originally added a PS to my post indicating that I felt we were a little easy on ourselves with MARC field 246 in past years, meaning that I wondered if the earlier title change shouldn't have resulted in a new record. I am going to create a new record, after a careful second look at OCLC. Thanks. Patrick -----Original Message----- From: AUTOCAT [mailto:AUTOCAT@...] On Behalf Of Steven C Shadle Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:04 PM To: AUTOCAT@... Subject: Re: [ACAT] Serials question: major/minor title change Patrick -- Sorry, but I'm a little confused by your statements. You said "up until 2006 its title was Report of the Attorney General", but then stated "in past years, its title has been: Annual report of the Attorney-General." The addition or deletion of the word "annual" in the first five words is considered a major change. I know this isn't what you're asking, but it sounds like 2006 had title "Report of the ...." and 2007 was either "Fiscal year ... annual report" or "Annual report" depending on interpretation of presentation. If this is the case, no matter which judgment you make for 2007 title, it's a major change. Please let me know if I've misunderstood the fact of the case. Steve Shadle/Serials Access Librarian ***** shadle <at> u.washington.edu University of Washington Libraries *** Phone: (206) 685-3983 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 * Fax: (206) 543-0854 On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Patrick Lavey wrote: > Hello: > > > > I have an annual report from the Massachusetts Attorney General. Up > until 2006, its title was: Report of the Attorney General. This has changed > to: Fiscal year . annual report. In past years, its title has been: Annual > report of the Attorney-General. > > > > For minor title changes, AACR2R, rule 21.2C2, b) vi) states: The > addition, deletion, or change of words anywhere in the title that link the > title to the numbering. I am unsure of whether "Fiscal year" is such a > change. > > > > I am inclined to start a new record anyway, as past annual reports > have included summaries of significant cases handled by the office, and this > one does not. > > > > How do other catalogers interpret 21.2C2 in a case such as this? *********************************************************************** AUTOCAT quoting guide: http://www.cwu.edu/~dcc/Autocat/copyright.html E-mail AUTOCAT listowners: autocat-request@... Search AUTOCAT archives: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/autocat.html By posting messages to AUTOCAT, the author does not cede copyright *********************************************************************** *********************************************************************** AUTOCAT quoting guide: http://www.cwu.edu/~dcc/Autocat/copyright.html E-mail AUTOCAT listowners: autocat-request@... Search AUTOCAT archives: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/autocat.html By posting messages to AUTOCAT, the author does not cede copyright ***********************************************************************
RSS Feed