29 Dec 17:51
Re: Summary of Dynamed vs. Up-To-Date query
From: Shaffer, Christopher J <chris-shaffer@...>
Subject: Re: Summary of Dynamed vs. Up-To-Date query
Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.medlib
Date: 2005-12-29 16:51:59 GMT
Subject: Re: Summary of Dynamed vs. Up-To-Date query
Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.medlib
Date: 2005-12-29 16:51:59 GMT
There are also reviews in JMLA. http://pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1175815 http://pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=141198 ----- Chris Shaffer, M.S., Assistant Director for Public Services Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa 319-335-7221 (voice) 319-353-3752 (fax) chris-shaffer@... http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/hardin/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Medical Libraries Discussion List > [mailto:MEDLIB-L@...] On Behalf Of Mary Nolan > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 3:22 PM > To: MEDLIB-L@... > Subject: Summary of Dynamed vs. Up-To-Date query > > With special thanks to Diane E. Johnson for the informative articles: > > > > http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/abstract/3/6/507 > > > http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/data/3/6/507/DC1/1 > > Hers was the only response I'd received. I also had my EBSCO > rep set me up > with a demo of DynaMed. I will compare and contrast the two. > > Thanks. > > M. Nolan, MLS > MNolan@... >
RSS Feed