7 Jan 2007 10:37
Re: Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX
Ralf Angeli <angeli <at> caeruleus.net>
2007-01-07 09:37:28 GMT
2007-01-07 09:37:28 GMT
* David Kastrup (2007-01-07) writes: > IIRC, Arch had problems on Windows. Okay, that's an argument. > And again: the idea was to have > RefTeX available to the AUCTeX developer community without further > ado. Basing the decision on such argumentation would be short-sighted. What does it help to use a system where people can jump right in but which imposes a lot more overhead on them in the long run? We should not miss the opportunity now to make our lives easier just because "we've always done it like that." -- -- Ralf
RSS Feed