bug#219: marked as done (23.0.60; propertize looses :height)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:35:35 -0400
with message-id <18537.31703.409869.122531 <at> fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line #219
has caused the Emacs bug report #219,
regarding 23.0.60; propertize looses :height
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don <at> donarmstrong.com
immediately.)

-- 
219: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don <at> donarmstrong.com with problems

From: Lennart Borgman (gmail <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
Subject: 23.0.60; propertize looses :height
Date: 2008-05-11 10:06:35 GMT

A :height property given to `propertize' is not always shown correctly. 
To see this start with

   emacs -Q

and paste the following in a new buffer

   (progn
     (insert (propertize
              "Some text\n"
              'face (list
                     'bold
                     :height 2.0
                     :foreground "green")))
     (insert (propertize
              "Some text\n"
              'face (list
                     :height 2.0
                     :foreground "red")))
     )

and evaluate it. The first line text will get the desired height, but 
the second will not.

In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
  of 2008-05-09
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags 
-Ic:/g/include -fno-crossjumping'

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Subject: #219
Date: 2008-07-01 00:35:35 GMT

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-05/msg01758.html

      I can't reproduce this. Do you still encounter the problem? 

Thanks, no it seems to be gone now.