Re: [PATCH] several small improvements

>> I added srecode-semantic-handle-:maybe-qualify to srecode-args.el. It
>> does the same thing as before but should work with any language, for
>> which the functions mentioned above do the right thing. srecode-cpp.el
>> then no longer needs the :using-namespace argument handler.

> That looks good.  The name :maybe-qualify seems a bit strange, but I'm 
> not sure what else to call it.  It's not fully qualified.  It's not just 
> the name.  It is minimally qualified?  That seems worse.  Maybe someone 
> else has an idea.

Sorry, I didn't follow this thread, so my proposal might be completely out of
place: `try-qualify'? `partially-qualify'? Or a shorter version with
`partial-qualify' or even imitating the FQN (fully qualified name): `pqn' (this
is one of these names that looks nice and short at start, but ends up
obfuscating the code in the long run).

Lluis

--
 "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
 something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
 -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
 Tollbooth

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev