9 Jul 03:42
Re: X fonts selection weirdness
From: Kenichi Handa <handa <at> m17n.org>
Subject: Re: X fonts selection weirdness
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Date: 2008-07-09 01:42:08 GMT
Subject: Re: X fonts selection weirdness
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Date: 2008-07-09 01:42:08 GMT
Sorry for the late response on this matter. In article <85ej6mnd5u.fsf <at> lola.goethe.zz>, David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes: > Kenichi Handa <handa <at> m17n.org> writes: > > I installed a fix. Please try again. > [...] > > The above should work, but I'm now thinking about > > introducing non-default-font-script-list: > [...] > I can't help feeling that we are currently stumbling without much > orientation through a maze of ad-hoc local patches and fixes. I've just installed a change that doesn't use non-default-font-script-list but respects the specification of fontset while giving the highest priority to the default font. We have these four font groups for non-ASCII characters. (1) What specified in the current fontset. (2) What specified in the default fontset (3) What specified as the fallbacks in the current fontset. (3) What specified as the fallbacks in the default fontset. The latest Emacs tries each of the above font group in the above order. And while selecting a font from a font group, if the default font (i.e. what selected for ASCII characters of the current face) supports the target character, and if any of a font in the group matches with the default font, select the default font. This way, Emacs uses the default font for all characters except for such characters that the fontset doesn't specify a font matching with it. --- Kenichi Handa handa <at> ni.aist.go.jp
RSS Feed