XEmacs or GNU Emacs

On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Martin Maechler wrote:

>>>>>> "NJ" == Nitin Jain <nj7w <at> yahoo.com>
>>>>>>     on Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:32:03 -0700 (PDT) writes:
>
>    NJ> Thanks Rodney.
>    NJ> This means that for now, I should use either native xemacs or unset the DISPLAY every time I start cygwin.
>
> or -- excuse the "heresy" -- switch from Xemacs to GNU emacs.
> For the latter, you can get the nicely windows pre-installed
> setup from Vincent Goulet's site.
>

Which is a question I have recently been considering.

I have used XEmacs for a few years. My usage is for R with ESS, TeX with 
AUCTeX, sweave, .Rd files for my R package, a bit of mySQL and html.

Does either XEmacs or GNU Emacs have an edge these days? I have got the 
impression the Emacs has advanced more than XEmacs recently.

Any opinions?

David Scott

_________________________________________________________________
David Scott	Department of Statistics, Tamaki Campus
 		The University of Auckland, PB 92019
 		Auckland 1142,    NEW ZEALAND
Phone: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86830		Fax: +64 9 373 7000
Email:	d.scott <at> auckland.ac.nz

Graduate Officer, Department of Statistics
Director of Consulting, Department of Statistics

______________________________________________
ESS-help <at> stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help