12 Jul 04:06
Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
From: Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch <at> googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Date: 2008-07-12 02:06:07 GMT
Subject: Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Date: 2008-07-12 02:06:07 GMT
On 10 Jul., 16:53, Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> wrote: > You can set your user-mail-address and the FQDN for the message ID will > be automatically deduced from it (by message-make-fqdn, which calls > message-user-mail-address). Is that sufficient or do you need do set > the domain of the message ID separately from your user-mail-address? I just checked. I added those 3 lines again and sent a mail to my other mail account. Result: Message-Id: <83d4ljuakt.fsf <at> home.localdomain> This is no vaild id. My machine is named home. And even if there would be Message-Id: <83d4ljuakt.fsf <at> googlemail.com>, this would still not be vaild, because my machine has no right to create a message Id like this. This might result in duplicate M-ID, which is usually no problem. But using Mailing lists, there is a tiny little chance this might be a problem. So this approach is just not clean, AFAIK. No, the smtp-server creates my M-ID and I am pretty sure that google knows how to avoid duplicate ones ;).
RSS Feed