2 Oct 2002 08:40
Re: Stop Card (was WBF CoC comments solicited)
Marvin L. French <mfrench1 <at> san.rr.com>
2002-10-02 06:40:17 GMT
2002-10-02 06:40:17 GMT
From: "Herman De Wael" < > > I can see a clear difference between a Kaplan question and a Pro one. > A big difference. Evidently Kaplan did not believe that requiring opponents to correct a deficient explanation constitutes an illegal communication with partner. There's something to that, but the Laws do say that the TD must be called when attention is drawn to an irregularity. So it boils down to whether a deficient explanation is indeed an irregularity. Perhaps that should be up to the opponents to decide, as it is often a minor and inadvertent transgression that hardly needs TD attention. Marv Marvin L. French San Diego, California _______________________________________________ blml mailing list blml <at> rtflb.org http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
RSS Feed