1 Nov 2006 16:12
Re: Clubbed Queen
Ed Reppert <ereppert <at> rochester.rr.com>
2006-11-01 15:12:44 GMT
2006-11-01 15:12:44 GMT
On Nov 1, 2006, at 4:06 AM, Sven Pran wrote: > (Or if East did not hear clearly what was said by Declarer then > East may > have mistaken Declarer's call for coffee as the call for a card.) Oh, come on. This is a bit ridiculous. > Dummy did not place any card in a played position or otherwise > indicate that > a card was played. So what? Which law says such action by dummy is necessary for a card to have been played? > The fact is that no card has been played from Dummy, and East has > little if > any excuse for being unaware of that fact. That's two facts. Although I'm not so sure the first one, at least, *is* a fact. _______________________________________________ blml mailing list blml <at> amsterdamned.org http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
RSS Feed