DIS: Proto-Judgement: CFJ 1739

On 8/29/07, Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org> wrote:
> Statement: A part of a message sent to a Public Forum that is quoting
>            another message (even if the quote is intended to perform an
>            action) is never a violation of Rule 2149 to publish.

[Proto-Judgement]

Veracity: UNDECIDABLE

The statement assumes that a violation can necessarily be assigned to
specific parts of a message, which is a false assumption. Rule 2149
itself states "the truth or falsity of the whole is what is
significant."

--

-- 
The Goddess Eris <taralx <at> gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
    -- Unknown