6 Sep 23:45
Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
Keith Moore <moore <at> cs.utk.edu>
2006-09-06 21:45:58 GMT
2006-09-06 21:45:58 GMT
I concur with the need to maintain the current charset registry to support legacy apps that use it. And I think Ned would be an excellent choice for reviewer, though it wouldn' t bother me if he could have the assistance of people with specialized expertise in Asian writing schemes. As for utf-8 vs. Unicode, this is a bit tricky. I agree that merely specifying Unicode isn't sufficient given the potential for incompatible CESs. And yet I'm sympathetic to the notion that UTF-8 pessimizes storage and transmission of text written in certain languages. IMHO it's unreasonable to exclude the potential for a Unicode based CES that has more-or-less equivalent information density across a wide variety of languages. But I do think that use of multiple CESs in a new protocol should require substantial justification, and that UTF-8 should be presumed to be the CES of choice for any new protocol that requires ASCII compatibility for its character representation. Keith
RSS Feed