18 Jul 2007 21:32
RE: WLAN switch controller I-Ds for BMWG to consider
Romascanu, Dan (Dan <dromasca <at> avaya.com>
2007-07-18 19:32:03 GMT
2007-07-18 19:32:03 GMT
Let me complement Al's phrase: ... to the extent that these protocols are part of IP-based internetworking solutions. Which seems to be the case here. Dan (speaking as a contributor) > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Morton [mailto:acmorton <at> att.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:46 PM > To: curtis <at> occnc.com; Tom Alexander > Cc: bmwg <at> ietf.org > Subject: Re: [bmwg] WLAN switch controller I-Ds for BMWG to consider > > At 02:13 PM 7/18/2007, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > If we don't get any further comments we have to assume > that fixing > > > the issues David pointed out would make them perfect!> > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Tom A. (on behalf of the other I-D authors) > > > > > >Or lack or interest. > > > >Why is the IETF BMWG proposing benchmarks for a purely IEEE L2 spec? > > Our scope is historically wider than IETF-developed protocols alone. > See the RFCs on LAN Switches, ATM and Frame Relay on our charter page. > > Al > bmwg chair > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg <at> ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Tom A. (on behalf of the other I-D authors)
> >
> >
> >Or lack or interest.
> >
> >Why is the IETF BMWG proposing benchmarks for a purely IEEE L2 spec?
>
> Our scope is historically wider than IETF-developed protocols alone.
> See the RFCs on LAN Switches, ATM and Frame Relay on our charter page.
>
> Al
> bmwg chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg <at> ietf.org
>
RSS Feed