Romascanu, Dan (Dan | 18 Jul 2007 21:32
Favicon

RE: WLAN switch controller I-Ds for BMWG to consider

Let me complement Al's phrase: 

... to the extent that these protocols are part of IP-based
internetworking solutions.

Which seems to be the case here. 

Dan
(speaking as a contributor)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Morton [mailto:acmorton <at> att.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:46 PM
> To: curtis <at> occnc.com; Tom Alexander
> Cc: bmwg <at> ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] WLAN switch controller I-Ds for BMWG to consider 
> 
> At 02:13 PM 7/18/2007, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > > If we don't get any further comments we have to assume 
> that fixing 
> > > the issues David pointed out would make them perfect! :-)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Tom A. (on behalf of the other I-D authors)
> >
> >
> >Or lack or interest.
> >
> >Why is the IETF BMWG proposing benchmarks for a purely IEEE L2 spec?
> 
> Our scope is historically wider than IETF-developed protocols alone.
> See the RFCs on LAN Switches, ATM and Frame Relay on our charter page.
> 
> Al
> bmwg chair
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg <at> ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> 

Gmane