25 Oct 2007 22:54
BMWG Status from Al's POV
Al Morton <acmorton <at> att.com>
2007-10-25 20:54:23 GMT
2007-10-25 20:54:23 GMT
Folks, We have about a month till the next meeting. Below I've reproduced the Action Items from our IETF-69 session and my view of progress. If your name doesn't appear below, read a draft anyway, and everyone can root for Kevin's BoSox. They're the only org. I know of that seems to be ahead of schedule (they were supposed to wait 86 years before winning another pennant). Al bmwg chair =========================================================================== >Action Items > >Jay Karthik has volunteered to restart the BGP convergence methodology, >and Rajiv Papneja also volunteered to help out. Attempts to contact the existing authors have gone unanswered, AFAIK. >David Ward will identify a RIP expert to consult on adding RIP to >the IGP Dataplane drafts, and a small group of volunteers to help >expand the scope >and resolve the DISCUSS comments. A design team was formed in August. There have been revisions to the drafts, and there are more comments to deal with now. >The IPv6 Author team will look into whether a reference to the Hash and >Stuffing RFC 4814 is appropriate in their memo. They will also pursue the >frame size issue on the list. WGLC ends on August 10. The third WGLC call closed with 2 minor comments. Version-04 addresses them. I have waited in case any late comments arrived (they didn't), so I am declaring consensus and preparing the publication request. >All authors to check that their drafts print-out properly, with no line >wraps. Margins to body text should be 3 spaces, no more. Please do this. >Regarding the IPsec drafts, folks should read and comment on the >need for an IKE flood scenario and whether the back-to-back test >should be included. Scott Poretsky, Rajiv Papneja, Muninder Sambi, >Sanjay Hooda, and Benno Overinder all volunteered to review the >IPsec drafts. Jerry Perser also volunteered to help Merike finish >the documents. No action here, AFAIK. >There's lots of work being proposed, so the WG needs to read these drafts too >and comment on what is most relevant to do next. The ball's in your court, BMWG.
RSS Feed