27 Jun 2002 10:29
RE: Support of LAN FCS in Ethernet packet over ATM AAL5.
Nurit Sprecher <nurit.sprecher <at> SeabridgeNetworks.com>
2002-06-27 08:29:42 GMT
2002-06-27 08:29:42 GMT
One more question please. In case that the LAN FCS is not supported (e.g. in LLC encapsulation format the PID is 0x00-07), does the LAN FCS appear in the packet with arbitrary value? I guess that the LAN FCS does not appear in the packet at all in such a case. Can you please confirm it? Thanks again, Nurit. -----Original Message----- From: Nurit Sprecher Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:19 AM To: 'Manuel Stol'; PPPoE Mailing List (E-mail) Cc: 'bridge-mib <at> ietf.org'; 'hubmib <at> ietf.org' Subject: Support of LAN FCS in Ethernet packet over ATM AAL5. In RFC 2684 on Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5, the Payload Format for Bridged Ethernet/802.3 PDUs is defined as follows: +-------------------------------+ | MAC destination address | +-------------------------------+ | | | (remainder of MAC frame) | | | +-------------------------------+ | LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-01) | +-------------------------------+ The LAN FCS option is VC dependent. In case that the LAN FCS is supported, duplicate checksum calculations are performed: one for the AAL5 frame and one for the Ethernet frame. In what cases is it required/suggested/worth to support the LAN FCS when transmitting a packet within an AAL5 packet over an ATM network? Can a bridge that resides at the end of the ATM, de-capsulate the ATM packet and transmit the Ethernet packet over a LAN, calculate the LAN FCS and set it in the Ethernet packet (if required)? Thanks in advance, Nurit Sprecher
RSS Feed