Next steps

Hi,

In the meeting, the following next steps for our charter items were 
proposed:

draft-ietf-csi-hash-threat will be shipped to the IESG

draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send: we will issue the WGLC right away

draft-ietf-csi-send-cert will be updated and the message format for 
getting the CRL information will be removed, only the default URI based 
method will be kept in the document. The WG can discuss separatelly 
whether we want to define the send messages to obtain CRL information.

draft-rgaglian-csi-send-name-type-registry-01 will be adopted as WG 
document, so authors should submit this as draft-ietf-csi-...

draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps needs to address S. Kent comments about the 
security achieved by using CGGAs to authorize the DHCP server (i.e. 
relies on haivingt he dhcp address configured and not very different 
from having a shared  secret configured, and describe the leap of faith 
approach as well. In addition, should cover the privacy issues with 
storing the CGA information in a central repository)

In addition, we need to continue the discussion on PK agility support in 
SeND.

The goal of this mail is to confirm the agreement in the ml. so if 
people have issues with the proposed next steps please speak up before 
dec 1st. If no objections are presented, i would ask the editors to 
update the document to reflect this.

Regards, marcelo