Re: Removing ip6.int

> 
> 	The rest is apparently a religious crusade to wipe out all remenants
> 	of the old ways.

I don't think so.

From my perspective maintaining ip6.int is not cost-free, because it uses up
cycles worrying if something you do might break it.  This is an intrinsic
problem when things get old and nobody except a few know what the connections
are. 

As far as the cost of the migration -- that cost has to be met, no matter
what, it's just a matter of when.  By now, people who make pro-active
changes have already done so -- the rest won't until ip6.int finally goes
away. 

--

-- 
Kent Crispin 
kent <at> icann.org    p: +1 310 823 9358  f: +1 310 823 8649
kent <at> songbird.com SIP: 81202 <at> fwd.pulver.com

.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html