consensus-based root priming, was Re: Adopt ...

At 8:28 -0400 6/7/07, Thierry Moreau wrote:

>By the way, does IETF dnsop need to discuss a consensus-based DNSSEC root
>priming specification? I whish an open discussion is possible.

Participation in the IETF is voluntary.  Nothing "needs (as in 
has-must)" to be done, anything that is done is because the 
participants are willing to work together.  Based on the long-running 
(months-years) tilting over IPR claims, I am not willing to 
participate in any such discussion.

I've been silent on this topic as I have little to add.  My silence 
is not because I don't care, it's that I don't think it is worth 
getting involved given the atmosphere.

I know it takes two to tango, that it may appear that I am 
discouraged because of the back-and-forth over this, but it is the 
IPR claims that started it.  The push back is understandable.
--

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Sarcasm doesn't scale.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop