4 Apr 2012 17:31
Re: Request to adopt draft-sotomayor-as112-ipv4-cull as WG item
Tony Finch <dot <at> dotat.at>
2012-04-04 15:31:00 GMT
2012-04-04 15:31:00 GMT
Joe Abley <joe.abley <at> icann.org> wrote: > > the add/drop problem is a lot simpler if every AS112 node hosts the zone > > $ORIGIN . > <at> SOA ... > NS something > NS sensible > > and answers authoritatively on the addresses corresponding to > "something" and "sensible", returning NXDOMAIN for everything in the > entire namespace apart from . (for which they ought never receive > queries anyway). This is ugly to some eyes, but it works for domainers > and it ought to work for us too. I think BIND treats NXDOMAIN replies with the wrong authority as a FORMERR. Domainers are returning positive replies which BIND does not subject to a SOA sanity check. Tony. -- -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot <at> dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Northerly 5 to 7, occasionally 4 at first, increasing gale 8 later in north Fitzroy. Moderate or rough, becoming very rough later in north Fitzroy. Showers. Moderate or good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP <at> ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
RSS Feed