29 Oct 2004 21:15
RE: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-entmib-v3-05.txt
C. M. Heard <heard <at> pobox.com>
2004-10-29 19:15:28 GMT
2004-10-29 19:15:28 GMT
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: >[Andy Bierman wrote:] > >[Mike Heard wrote:] > > >I see that this document has a derivative works limitation on the > > >front page: > > > > > > This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may > > > not be created, except to publish it as an RFC and to translate it > > > into languages other than English. > > > > > > > > >Surely this is a mistake? > > > > probably. I thought this was supposed to be in an I-D > > that is intended to be published as an RFC. I don't > > claim to understand the massive set of new CLRs for I-Ds.The paragraph I quoted above says (per RFC 3667) that the IETF is not permitted to make future revisions to the spec -- which I'm sure is not what you intended. I have to agree with you that the rules are becoming very difficult to understand. > Sorry for the CLRs. But I think you can just remove that one para > > Bert That sounds right, from what I understand of RFC 3667 and its pending update. //cmh
The paragraph I quoted above says (per RFC 3667) that the IETF is
not permitted to make future revisions to the spec -- which I'm sure
is not what you intended.
I have to agree with you that the rules are becoming very difficult
to understand.
> Sorry for the CLRs. But I think you can just remove that one para
>
> Bert
That sounds right, from what I understand of RFC 3667 and its
pending update.
//cmh
RSS Feed