Weiming Wang | 1 Dec 2005 16:28
Picon

Re: LFBClassID

Hi Evangelos,

Thank you again for the review. I think it will be fixed by the protocol and the
model for the consistency.

thanks,
weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evangelos Haleplidis" <ehalep <at> ee.upatras.gr>
Subject: LFBClassID

> Greetings to the list,
>
> This is an editorial comment.
>
> In Page 43 of the Protocol draft, the FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned
> to the value of 0x01.
> "The FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x1."
>
> In Appendix B of the Protocol draft page 80 the FE LFB is assigned the
> value of 0x02.
>
> In Page 82 of the Model draft, the FE Object LFB Class ID is assigned to
> the value of 0x01.
> "This LFB will have a class, FEObject.  The LFBClassID for this class is 1."
>
> Two corrective actions are needed:
>
> 1. Page 80 of the Protocol draft:
> "FE LFB" should be changed to "FE Object LFB" for clarification reasons.
>
> 2. Page 82 of the Model draft:
> "The LFBClassID for this class is 1." should be changed to "The LFBClassID
> of the FE Object LFB is assigned the value of 0x02".
>
> Regards,
>
> Evangelos Haleplidis.


Gmane