1 Dec 2005 16:28
Re: LFBClassID
Weiming Wang <wmwang <at> mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
2005-12-01 15:28:49 GMT
2005-12-01 15:28:49 GMT
Hi Evangelos, Thank you again for the review. I think it will be fixed by the protocol and the model for the consistency. thanks, weiming ----- Original Message ----- From: "Evangelos Haleplidis" <ehalep <at> ee.upatras.gr> Subject: LFBClassID > Greetings to the list, > > This is an editorial comment. > > In Page 43 of the Protocol draft, the FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned > to the value of 0x01. > "The FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x1." > > In Appendix B of the Protocol draft page 80 the FE LFB is assigned the > value of 0x02. > > In Page 82 of the Model draft, the FE Object LFB Class ID is assigned to > the value of 0x01. > "This LFB will have a class, FEObject. The LFBClassID for this class is 1." > > Two corrective actions are needed: > > 1. Page 80 of the Protocol draft: > "FE LFB" should be changed to "FE Object LFB" for clarification reasons. > > 2. Page 82 of the Model draft: > "The LFBClassID for this class is 1." should be changed to "The LFBClassID > of the FE Object LFB is assigned the value of 0x02". > > Regards, > > Evangelos Haleplidis.
RSS Feed