9 Feb 23:40
RE: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP
SM <sm <at> resistor.net>
2012-02-09 22:40:18 GMT
2012-02-09 22:40:18 GMT
Hi Ron, At 12:40 PM 2/9/2012, Ronald Bonica wrote: >At NANOG 54, ARIN reported that they are down to 5.6 /8s. If just >four ISPs ask for a /10 for CGN, we burn one of those /8s. > >Is that really a good idea? The short answer is no. The long answer is a bit complicated as it would be difficult to justify efficient utilization of a /10 within a three-month time frame. There are also specific policies which can be used to get a /10. From an IETF perspective, I understand that the IESG is faced with a difficult decision and I respect its decision. I note that Chris Grundemann has been fair when we interacted in a non-IETF venue. Based on the above, I'll keep the -1 for the determination of consensus. Regards, -sm
RSS Feed