IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for October 4, 2007

          INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the October 4, 2007 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 23:56:17 EDT, September 27, 2007
Web version of this agenda can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html

1. Administrivia

  1.1 Roll Call
  1.2 Bash the Agenda
  1.3 Approval of the Minutes
  1.4 Review of Action Items

2. Protocol Actions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
	reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
	infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-mboned-routingarch-10.txt
    Overview of the Internet Multicast Routing Architecture (BCP) - 1 of 4 
    Token: Ron Bonica
  o draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-isis-08.txt
    IS-IS Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery 
    (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt
    Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks (BCP) - 3 of 4 
    Token: Ron Bonica
  o draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt
    Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 
    Note: Document Shepherd is Bob Hinden &lt;bob.hinden <at> nokia.com&gt; 
    Token: Jari Arkko

2.1.2 Returning Item
  o draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt
    Specification of the IPFIX Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow 
    Information (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 
    Note: A previous version draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt of this draft 
    was. already approved by the IESG. The IPFIX WG decided to make changes to 
    that. version of the document with the principal goal of removing the SCTP. 
    stream 0 restriction. Reviews should focus on the changes since. 
    draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt which are mentioned in an editorial note. 
    currently placed after the Table of Contents.. 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt
    Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 
    Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman 
    Token: Jari Arkko

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
  o draft-wilde-text-fragment-08.txt
    URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type (Proposed Standard) 
    - 1 of 1 
    Token: Chris Newman

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
  o draft-edwards-urn-smpte-02.txt
    A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Society of Motion Picture 
    and Television Engineers (SMPTE) (Informational) - 1 of 3 
    Token: Chris Newman
  o draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15.txt
    EAP-IKEv2 Method (Experimental) - 2 of 3 
    Note: There is no Document Shepherd.. Note: LC expires Oct 9, I will take 
    this to the IESG 5 days before that 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt
    Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task 
    Force (IETF) (Experimental) - 3 of 3 
    Note: No document shepherd.. Note: LC Expires Oct 8, will take this to IESG 
    four days before that 
    Token: Jari Arkko

3.2.2 Returning Item
  o draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
    DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Russ Housley

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
  o HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) - 1 of 1
    Token: Lisa
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
    NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
  o Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) - 1 of 2
    Token: Jari
  o Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) - 2 of 2
    Token: Lars
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
    NONE

5. IAB News We can use

6. Management Issue

 6.1 IESG Statement about Appeals (Russ Housley)

 6.2 Expert for RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-15.txt [IANA #106002] (Michelle Cotton)

 6.3 ion-2026-practice.html (Russ Housley)

7. Agenda Working Group News