Re: ideas for new work

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Newman" <chris.newman <at> oracle.com>
To: <ima <at> ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:55 PM
Subject: [EAI] ideas for new work

>> - Chris Newman recommended a submission protocol extension, can be 
> experimental
> 
> The submission-only extension would be layered on top of the new SMTP 
> extension and seems like it should be experimental (since it is tricky).  

what is the aim or reason to have this experimental submission protocol?

after experimental, we move it to standarad track?

>> - Re-charter wording and deliverables reviewed 
> 
> We'll need to revise the downgrade spec.  The new one never attempts to 
> preserve UTF-8 addresses in a separate header (except maybe received), 
> doesn't have to deal with <utf8 <at> utf8 <alt <at> alt>> syntax, and for the 
> POP/IMAP case where the alt-addresses are unavailable, we simply choose 
> some corruption of the address. 

based on my understanding to the last ietf conlcusion, we propose no downgrade solution, so the downgrade
document will be dropped rather than being revised.

We revise the downgrade spec for the usage of POP/IMAP case or other cases?

Jiankang Yao

> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima