RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF

Harry,

My preference would be to move the date to July 21.

	Ron Bergman
	Hitachi Printing Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: don <at> lexmark.com [mailto:don <at> lexmark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:54 AM
To: Harry Lewis
Cc: pwg-announce <at> pwg.org
Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF

My choices, in order of preference:

July 21
Leave as is (July 14)
June 16

**********************************************
 Don Wright                 don <at> lexmark.com

 Member, IEEE SA Standards Board
         PatCom Chair, SCC Liaison
 Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
 f.wright <at> ieee.org / f.wright <at> computer.org

 Director, Alliances & Standards
 Lexmark International
 740 New Circle Rd
 Lexington, Ky 40550
 859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************

"Harry Lewis" <harryl <at> us.ibm.com> <at> pwg.org on 11/25/2002 11:14:01 PM

Sent by:    owner-pwg-announce <at> pwg.org

To:    pwg-announce <at> pwg.org
cc:
Subject:    PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF

It has been pointed out that our July 2003 meeting date (14-18) is the
same week as the IETF meeting in Vienna.

I would like to gauge the severity of this conflict to PWG members and
preferences should a our schedule need to be modified. If you have an
opinion please indicate

1. Prefer to keep current PWG July 14 -18 meeting date
2. Prefer to move PWG meeting to week of June 16
3. Prefer to move PWG meeting to week of July 21

I do not feel any other dates are viable due to the proximity of USA
Independence Day and the common practice of extending this holiday with
vacation.

No response will be considered a "don't care" NOT a "leave as is".

Please respond by Thursday Dec 12.

----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
(See attached file: C.htm)