todd glassey | 1 Mar 16:55
Picon

Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work

Sorry Harald - the derivative rights requirements can be gleaned from this
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.html#derivative the USD Government's
COPYRIGHT.GOV website's FAQ's on Derivative Works...

I suggest that you review the law as it stands and then recant these words
since the derivative rights section is also clearly broken - why is it that
this group thinks it gets to re-write law.

Todd Glassey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harald Alvestrand" <harald <at> alvestrand.no>
To: <ipr-wg <at> ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:38 AM
Subject: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative
work

> After having heard the discussion, I conclude that this resolution is
> accepted by the WG, and the issue is closed.
>
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> > I think this has gone on long enough.
> >
> > This is a WG Last Call on issue #1198, with a timeout of one week, and
> > I'll close it on February 28.
> >
> > SUGGESTED RESOLUTION:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Implementations of IETF standards that incorporate pieces of IETF
> > documents (such as MIBs or data tables) need to have the right to
> > produce derivative works based on those pieces.
> >
> > Implementations of IETF standards that do not incorporate such pieces
> > do not need the right to produce such derivative works.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > I believe that corresponds to the advice of counsel, and to the
> > opinion of the vast majority of this working group.
> >
> > Note that this has absolutely no effect on the need to have rights to
> > practice applicable patents; this is strictly about copyright.
> >
> > I know that Todd Glassey does not agree with this statement. Other
> > people who do not agree with this statement are hereby encouraged to
> > speak up; references to specific case law (in any jurisdiction) that
> > is clearly contrary to this opinion will be appreciated.
> >
> >                 Harald Alvestrand, co-chair of IPR WG
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipr-wg mailing list
> > Ipr-wg <at> ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg <at> ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

Gmane