1 Mar 16:55
Re: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work
todd glassey <todd.glassey <at> worldnet.att.net>
2006-03-01 15:55:00 GMT
2006-03-01 15:55:00 GMT
Sorry Harald - the derivative rights requirements can be gleaned from this http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.html#derivative the USD Government's COPYRIGHT.GOV website's FAQ's on Derivative Works... I suggest that you review the law as it stands and then recant these words since the derivative rights section is also clearly broken - why is it that this group thinks it gets to re-write law. Todd Glassey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harald Alvestrand" <harald <at> alvestrand.no> To: <ipr-wg <at> ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:38 AM Subject: CLOSED #1198 Proposed resolution - Implementation and derivative work > After having heard the discussion, I conclude that this resolution is > accepted by the WG, and the issue is closed. > > Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > > I think this has gone on long enough. > > > > This is a WG Last Call on issue #1198, with a timeout of one week, and > > I'll close it on February 28. > > > > SUGGESTED RESOLUTION: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Implementations of IETF standards that incorporate pieces of IETF > > documents (such as MIBs or data tables) need to have the right to > > produce derivative works based on those pieces. > > > > Implementations of IETF standards that do not incorporate such pieces > > do not need the right to produce such derivative works. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > I believe that corresponds to the advice of counsel, and to the > > opinion of the vast majority of this working group. > > > > Note that this has absolutely no effect on the need to have rights to > > practice applicable patents; this is strictly about copyright. > > > > I know that Todd Glassey does not agree with this statement. Other > > people who do not agree with this statement are hereby encouraged to > > speak up; references to specific case law (in any jurisdiction) that > > is clearly contrary to this opinion will be appreciated. > > > > Harald Alvestrand, co-chair of IPR WG > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ipr-wg mailing list > > Ipr-wg <at> ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ipr-wg mailing list > Ipr-wg <at> ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
RSS Feed