We are looking for consensus on whether the Kitten WG should adopt the following drafts as work items:

    draft-cantor-ietf-sasl-saml-ec
    draft-mills-kitten-sasl-oauth

You can respond to lists (kitten or SASL), but please indicate your decision regardless if you are for or against the proposal.

If we do decide to shepherd these drafts then we will recharter again to include the following patch:

<at> <at> -50,10 +50,14 <at> <at>
 
 * A SASL Mechanism for OpenID
     draft-lear-ietf-sasl-openid-00
 * A SASL Mechanism for SAML
     draft-wierenga-ietf-sasl-saml-00
+* A SASL Mechanism for SAML Enhanced Client
+    draft-cantor-ietf-sasl-saml-ec
+* A SASL Mechanism for OAuth
+    draft-mills-kitten-sasl-oauth
 
 The transition from SASL to GSS-API mechanisms will allow a greater set of
 applications to utilize said mechanisms with SASL implementations that support
 the use of GSS-API mechanisms in SASL (draft-ietf-sasl-gs2).

Shawn.
--

_______________________________________________
sasl mailing list
sasl <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sasl