Re: Kerberos V5 over TLS and draft-josefsson-krb-tcp-expansion.txt

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams <at> sun.com> writes:

> Now, maybe the extension mechanism should be more complex so that
> first-come-first-serve assignments can be practical, but I don't see
> a need for this

We can use the RESERVED bit to build another extension mechanism if a
need develops.

> (I can picture two extensions, including the TLS extension).

You've piqued my curiosity. :)

> So I am in favor of the current text.

Thanks!