Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-gss-cb-hash-agility-06

Simon,

Thank you for your review and implementation of the draft.  I don't know 
of any other implementations.  I agree with your points and will submit 
a new version, hopefully later this week.

Regards,

Shawn.
--
On 04/ 4/11 10:32 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Sam Hartman<hartmans-ietf <at> mit.edu>  writes:
>
>> As an individual, I agree with Simon we should be using a RFC 3961
>> checksum, not a
>> GSS-level get_mic for this draft.
> The document already uses the RFC 3961 checksum (which is called
> get_mic), so that wasn't my point.
>
> One of my concerns was that it was not clear how an implementation would
> chose _which_ get_mic (CRC32, rsa-md4, hmac-sha1-96-aes128, etc).
> Fortunately, it is easy to resolve (see my suggestion).
>
> /Simon
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-krb-wg mailing list
> ietf-krb-wg <at> lists.anl.gov
> https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg
>

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg <at> lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg