Re: [PWE3] CEP IESG comments

Stewart,

Thanks  - that's the best approach, IHMO, given that there aren't any 
affected implementations.

Cheers,
Andy

At 12/5/2006 10:18 PM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>I have seen no comments to this list on this topic, so I assume
>that the WG has left the final decision to the authors.
>
>The most conservative approach seems to me to remove the L2TPv3
>text from the draft and write the L2TPv3 specific text in a
>separate draft at a later time.
>
>However I leave the final decision to the authors.
>
>- Stewart