Re: xml2rfc category (was RE: Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction alludetointendedbcp status?)

Scott Hollenbeck wrote:

> Are you using the most recent version of xml2rfc?

I use the Web interface (1.29) http://xml.resource.org/ and for
the validation http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/xml2rfc-valid/

> I'm pretty sure I've used this before without any trouble.

Maybe you prepared an RfC for the in-queue with number="XXXX"
and say seriesNo="100" for BCP 100, that has visible effects,

Or you used <note>, that's something I've not tested.  More
than one <workgroup> isn't the trick to add text below the WG.

                           Bye, Frank