Re: [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling

At 07:41 21/03/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Hi -
>(co-chair hat off)
> > From: "John Cowan" <jcowan <at> reutershealth.com>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn <at> mindspring.com>
> > Cc: <ltru <at> ietf.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 8:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling
>...
> > From what I understand of the IETF process, this WG could go dormant
> > until ISO 639-3 was released, and then wake up for a relatively brief
> > period to incorporate the necessary few paragraphs in RFC 3066bis to
> > create RFC 3066ter.
>...
>
>I think it would be really nice if we could put in text now that would not
>need revision later.

I fully agree with that. In particular ISO 639-4, which should permits to 
make the BCP 047 consistent with ISO 639-3, ISO 639-6 and the IANA entries 
- and obviously ISO 3166-2.
jfc