Re: Re: Registry in RDF/XML format

Hi -

> From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell <at> adelphia.net>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru <at> ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:40 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format
...
> Can we specify *how* they build the alternative-format registry files?
> If so, great.
...

Yes, I we could do that, but that would be a normative part of the
document via the IANA considerations section, even if what is
thereby generated is considered "informative".

I suspect that the IESG would want to see a pretty good rationale
for having IANA generate technically redundant representations of
the registry content.

Randy (as process-aware contributor)