Re: MANET Terminology Update

+1

On Jul 23, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Ulrich Herberg wrote:

> +1
> 
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff <at> cisco.com> wrote:
> I'm going to "+1" one (and only one) sentence in this email thread:
> 
> >
> > On 7/6/12, Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas <at> thomasclausen.org> wrote:
> >> I do not see the need for this terminology document in MANET:
> >
> 
> In my opinion as a working group participant, this is an unnecessary distraction for the working group,
and will not result in a meaningful document. I will not support it.
> 
> Regards,
> Stan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

----
boberry <at> cisco.com
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient.
This email may contain information that is protected by NDA. Any unauthorized review, use, distribution
or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.