4 Aug 1998 12:38
Bid and asked
Graham Klyne <GK <at> Dial.pipex.com>
1998-08-04 10:38:00 GMT
1998-08-04 10:38:00 GMT
At 16:36 29/07/98 -0400, Al Gilman wrote: >This sends me back to discussing a "bid/asked" distinction. It >may not be enough for each side to list tag/value pairs and for >us to check for match on this pair of abstract vectors. I think it is enough -- see later. [...] >If the demands asserted on each side are matched with compliance >from the other side, then we have a feasible exchange, a match. Yes. >If we have more than one match, we look at differential stuff to >achieve preference ordering. Yes, but I see this as a separate issue. >Is that already covered in the algebra as applications of an >abstract match operation, or do we need to add some sort of >mode, be it bid/asked or required/supported, to the tag/value >entries to complete the logic? My view is that the feature matching approach in -algebra- abstracts both bid and asked scenarios into a common framework. In actual *usage*, there would offers of and requests for capabilities that must be matched, but these are not distinguished within the feature matching framework. #g ------------ Graham Klyne _________ GK <at> ACM.ORG ___|_o_o_o_|_¬ \____________/ (nb Helva) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <at> Stoke Bruerne, Grand Union Canal
RSS Feed