Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03

Joe Abley;

> >> Does anybody have any other proposed changes to this document, or 
> >> should
> >> I roll a -04 with that change only, ready for wg last call?
> >
> > Can't we simply admit the fact that none of us have any operational
> > experience to be able to discuss multi6 requirement document
> > to be used later to evaluate proposals and move on without it?
> 
> Are you suggesting there are no network operators here?

No, I am not, as I am involved in operation of mobile IPv6 network
with more than 150 routers.

					Masataka Ohta