Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

Dear all,

I have seen two comments that favor accepting the document with the new 
IPR disclosed during WGLC. Previously there were mostly favorable 
comments (I counted 5 different ones to the WGLC) and two that wanted to 
kill the work  altogether, mainly as punitive action because the IETF 
rules were broken.

To enable progress, I will be asking our AD to resume publication of the 
draft.

Regards,
Jukka

On 12/28/2010 08:30 PM, Jukka Manner wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This message starts a Working Group Last Call on the NSIS over Tunnels
> document. Please send your comments on whether to accept the document
> and resend to our AD and for IETF LC, given the recent IPR disclosure.
>
> The WGLC ends on Monday 10.1.2011.
>
> The Columbia IPR statement can be found from:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1461/
>
> Please re-state/say explicitly whether your agree or disagree, I'd like
> to record the consensus of the WG in this thread.
>
> Regards,
> Jukka, co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis