1 Aug 2008 14:50
Re: pim session behavior at address-list option disappears
Yamamoto, Susumu <yamamoto.susumu <at> lab.ntt.co.jp>
2008-08-01 12:50:58 GMT
2008-08-01 12:50:58 GMT
Chris, Thank you very much for your quick response. I understand that PIM neighbor is kept, but the address list is updated to the latest information, i.e. no secondary address, right ? And what about the existing mFIB for which the secondary address received previously was used to determine RPF ? Regards, -Susumu --- > Yamamoto, Susumu initiated a hyperspace jump with: >> Dear all, >> >> I have a question regarding to address-list option >> of PIM-SM. >> >> Accoding to 4.3.1 of RFC4601, the option can be >> omitted if no secondadry addresses exist. >> >> Then, what is the expected behavior of PIM neighbor >> for some reason receving a Hello without address- >> list option which existed in the previous Hellos ? >> Just receive the Hello or delete the neighbor >> immediately, or else ? > > Receive the hello and update the address list stored. Since > the address list is not present then all of the addresses stored > will be deleted. > > Chris > > -- -- Susumu YAMAMOTO NTT Network Service Systems Lab. +81 422 59 2744 (tel), 5636 (fax)
RSS Feed