Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00

On 15 feb 2012, at 00:43, James Mitchell wrote:

> I agree with Andrew for including an optional "U-label" element. Server policy can dictate how it is used.

No, this spec should dictate how it is used. It should not be one more feature that can differ between epp implementations.

We should *not* diverge in epp on how we express domain names inside the protocol.

The 'e' is not that much of an 'e'.

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
provreg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg