[(nowhere)] FW: Please re-review draft-ietf-secsh-publickeyfile [I06-050928-0006]

Folks, I'm holding a discuss on the ssh publickeyfile draft because  IANA
doesn't understand what they are supposed to do.
The IANA change is one I didn't see discussed on the list and it seems to have introduced problems.

Bill, I assume you can work to resolution on this.

([unix socket]) by solipsist-nation (Cyrus
v2.1.16-IPv6-Debian-2.1.16-10) with LMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:19:34
-0500 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Return-Path: <apache <at> g13.icann.org>
Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu
(SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher
DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested)
by suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE1413105 for
<hartmans <at> suchdamage.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:19:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU
[18.7.7.76]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP
id k1ALJWRj027225 for <hartmans <at> suchdamage.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2006
16:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from g13.icann.org (g13.icann.org
[192.0.34.122]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with
ESMTP id k1ALJOwA022905 for <hartmans-ietf <at> mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Feb 2006
16:19:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from g13.icann.org (g13.icann.org
[127.0.0.1]) by g13.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
k1ALJaHL013768 for <hartmans-ietf <at> mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:19:36
-0800 Received: (from apache <at> localhost) by g13.icann.org
(8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k1ALJaMx013767; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:19:36
-0800 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:19:36 -0800 Message-Id:
<200602102119.k1ALJaMx013767 <at> g13.icann.org> To: hartmans-ietf <at> mit.edu
Subject: FW: Please re-review draft-ietf-secsh-publickeyfile
[I06-050928-0006] From: iana-drafts <at> icann.org Reply-To:
iana-drafts <at> icann.org Cc: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on
solipsist-nation.suchdamage.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=3.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0

Sam,

Sorry for the delayed response.

I have reviewed the new version and have put new comments in the tracker.
However, the IANA Considerations section still needs work.  There is not much detail regarding what type of
registry, are these values, what are the registration procedures, etc.

If you need for me to look at a new version of the IANA Considerations section, please let me know.

Thanks,

Michelle
IANA

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Hartman [mailto:hartmans-ietf <at> mit.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:59 PM
To: iana <at> iana.org
Subject: Please re-review draft-ietf-secsh-publickeyfile

Hi. the IANA considerations for this draft used to include no actions but
now includes actions. I'd appreciate it if you would review these actions.