Re: Affected SPC is a mandatory parameter in SUA SCON

Haresign,

The current draft is:

  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bidulock-sigtran-aspcong.00.txt

This is not a working group item.  The SUA IG is.  Also the
draft addresses M3UA.  The SUA IG does not.  No M3UA IG exists
currently.

As it stands, the draft is yet another non-WG extension draft,
twisting in the wind...

If we want to add work items, the corid and loadsel would be
better choices.  Particularly as they address blatant
deficiencies of these protocols that have existed since their
inception.

For SUA, there is the larger concern of the disposition of DLR
and TID labels that are broken.  This is better addressed by the
LOADSEL draft.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                        (Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:04:36)
>
> I agree, the draft that Brian put out looked good for resolving this
> issue.
> 
> Does it make any sense to combine this draft with the SUA implementor's
> guide as that discussion seems to be going on, or is that too
> complicated?
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln 
> 

--

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidulock <at> openss7.org
http://www.openss7.org/