Joel M. Halpern | 1 Feb 02:52 2005

Re: Namespaces and XCAP

Sounds like a good idea to me.  It makes the normal case efficient, and 
matches the human expectation.


At 08:29 PM 1/31/2005, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>We are not normatively dependent on XPath, so we can do what we choose. I 
>would propose that the application usage specify the default namespace. 
>Otherwise, every single XCAP URI will need to contain a xmlns() xpointer 
>expression declaring the default namespace for the documents, all of which 
>are likely to use the target namespace as the default.
>If we specify this, an xcap expression would be compatible with xpath 2.0 
>I believe.
>-Jonathan R.